Wigg & Co - costs capping
"Petursson and another -v- Hutchinson 3G UK Limited (2004) EWHC, then
2609 (TCC)."
" A Costs cap should normally be prospective and not retrospective, but see
"Smart -v- East Cheshire NHS Trust (2003) EWHC 2806 and Ledward (Tunbridge
Wells County Court)."
"The authorities suggest that the court expects and Order for capping costs
be made at an early stage."
"Both sides, have the right to a fair hearing. To impose a retrospective
limit on costs would amount to a breach of the Defendant's right to a fair
hearing. It would be a wholly exceptional case where it would be appropriate
to order a cap retrospectively. Future costs could normally be managed by
conventional case management and Detailed Assessment of costs after trial.
The appropriate time to consider a costs cap is at the early stages of an
action where the parties and the Court can together plan the steps needed to
bring the matter to trial and can consider the costs implications of those
steps and whether a cap is appropriate."
Next
page
Back to
previous page
Costing
News/Case Law menu
Back
Home