Wigg & Co - time to bill
Call us on 01892 529518. Experience counts.
guidelines any legal aid bill submitted for assessment more than 3
months after it could first have been sent in may be subject to
deduction penalties unless firms can show good cause for late
The new rules apply to
any bills submitted after 31st July 2000.
Legal Aid Bills -
Out-of-Time - Penalties
In the matter of Homes Assured Corporation Plc, the Official Receiver
-v- Dobson and others, Samson and another -v- Wilson and another (ChD
These were Appeals from detailed assessments to Mr Justice Parkes
sitting with Assessors.
In the first case the Costs Judge disallowed the profit costs in their
In the second case the Costs Judge also disallowed the profit costs in
On Appeal it was held on the authorities relating to delay that the
court was not confronted with the stark choice between a reprimand but
no sanction on the one hand and a total striking out on the other. The
court can graduate the penalty. There is a built in sanction for delay
in lodging a public funding bill in that no interest is payable on the
outstanding costs and it is only the Solicitors who are prejudiced by
the delay. The delay is positively beneficial to the Legal Services
Commission who suffer no discernible prejudice while the delay in no way
impeded the normal and efficient assessment of the bill.
Regulation 109(1) did not authorise the Costs Judge to disallow costs
because he disapproved of the firm's conduct of the assessment. Whether
an item of costs in a bill was wasted or not must depend on
circumstances as they existed when the item was incurred. In the second
case where the Costs Judge disallowed the profit costs in their entirety
it was held that the delay could not justify disallowance of all the
profit costs by way of penalty which was disproportionate to such an
extent that it went beyond the acceptable limits for the exercise of the
Costs Judges discretion. The bill was remitted for a detailed assessment
to a different Costs Judge who should also determine whether there
should be a Regulation 109 reduction and if so what a proportionate
reduction would be.
Late submission of
Civil Bills for Assessment by the Commission.
Costs Appeals Committee
Point of Principle
CLA 27 27th August 2001
It is a question of fact in every case whether there is good reason, or
any exceptional circumstances exist, enabling the Regional Director to
extend the time limit in Regulation 105 (3a) Civil Legal Aid (General)
Regulations 1989. Where proceedings continue without interruption, and
there is no point at which it would normally be appropriate, or at which
it is in the client's interest, for an interim bill to be prepared (such
as on transfer to the County Court), but where the client has more than
one certificate, the Regional Director is likely to have good reason for
extending the time limit in relation to the claim for work done under
the first certificate.
News/Case Law menu