Wigg & Co - conditional
fee agreements statutory investment 2000
Call us on 01892 529518. Experience counts.
the Conditional Fee Agreement 2000 Statutory Instrument 2000 No. 692
which came into force from April 2000.
58(1) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 provides that a conditional fee agreement is not
unenforceable if is satisfies certain conditions. These include conditions to be specified in regulations under
section 58(3) of that Act.
2 and 3 specify those conditions. Regulation 2 applies to all conditional fee agreements./p>
3 sets out further requirements applying only to agreements which
provide for success fees.
58A(3) enables the conditions which may be prescribed for conditional
fee agreements to include requirements for the person providing advocacy
or litigation services to have provided prescribed information before
the agreement is made.
4 imposes such a requirement and specifies what information is to be
given. It does not apply
where the agreement is between legal representatives.
5 requires that agreements other than those between legal
representatives must be signed by the client and the legal
6 provides for similar requirements to apply as respects amendments of
regulations replace the Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 1995,
which are revoked.
CFA Risk Assessment
CPR does not define what a risk assessment should contain in order to be
valid or require that the solicitor for the receiving party should
ensure that a CFA detailed their rationale for assessing the risk of a
particular matter. Regulation 3 (1)(a) of the Conditional Fee Agreements
(CFA) Regulations 2000 (SI 2000 No 692) merely states that the CFA must
briefly specify the reason for setting a percentage increase at the
level stated in the agreement. On the face of it it would seem that a
simple statement that "this matter had a limited chance of
success" would suffice. CPR Rule 44.15 (1) and S32.7 of the Costs
Practice Direction take matters no further. A statement of reasons must
be served on the paying party as required by CPR Rule 44.3(b). Although
the rule contains a provision that an additional liability shall not be
recoverable where the statement of reasons has not been served S10.1 of
the Practice Direction provides relief from sanction provided that the
statement is served as quickly as possible after the solicitor becomes
aware of the default and even if he fails to do this CPR Rule 3.9(1)
comes to his rescue in some Courts who consider raising the failure to
serve the statement of reasons as a technical challenge which is saved
by the provisions of Rule 3.9 (1).
to previous page
News/Case Law menu